The Inquiry has become an embarrassment to the English legal system. Its exorbitant costs already cannot be justified, and there is only worse to come.
This inquiry is a disgrace and an insult to anyone with a brain. Further the solicitor who interviewed Dr. Carl Heneghan, should be removed from the inquiry immediately, but first he must offer Dr. Carl Hennighan an apology. We are wasting.
The inquiry was doomed to fail because it is headed by f*ckwits. The English legal system is a joke, the laughing stock of the world. Unless headed by a Chair with a knowledge of the principles of philosophy of science, scientific methodology and scientific reasoning, any inquiry would be a waste of time; a gravy train for lawyers making money at public expense. The whole world knows that the English legal system is a farce and corrupt.
No, it's not. The English health care and? Legal system, certified that I was 15 pc disabled from the mandatory Hep B vaccination I was forced to have as a healthcare worker. They stated in a letter that it was the trigger for the disability. Unfortunately, I could not get compensation from the NHS employer because the legal system could not find an expert witness who was willing to testify.
The system works. It's done what it is intended to do. It's created the appearance of justice without the reality and it's covered the arse of the powers that be. An expert witness who is willing to testify almost certainly exists somewhere. Unfortunately, you'd need at least the wealth of a Matt Hancock or another of your betters l to afford them. Rule Brittania, Brittania waives the rules. Britons forever and ever and ever will be slaves.
Excellent essay. This confirms my maxim that every important "truth-seeking" organization in the world is captured. The truth can't break through when 100 percent of the key actors are blocking it.
All the heavy lifting is going to have to be done by the non-captured smaller organizations (including Substack's contrarian writers). We can write off the official truth-seekers.
I have written a letter of complaint after Thursday’s proceedings.
I was shocked to read the transcript.
So either the inquiry should be stopped now if this level of bias continues. It would save an awful lot of money,
Or, the inquiry’s Mr. Keith is replaced by someone who asks the difficult questions, including the most important one:
Taking into account the WHO always dismissed lockdowns because these were too harmful, why did they think lockdowns were a good idea in the first place?
Nobody seems to be wanting to answer this question (if it ever gets asked) - what was it that led to the established, science and experienced backed pandemic plans, with associated ethical guidelines, being cast aside in favour of experimental lockdown strategies imported from China? Why was there felt a need to "reinvent the wheel"? Here in New Zealand when this utter shambles kicked off our then-Prime Minister announced that there was "no playbook" for dealing with this situation. Yes there was -the NZ Influenza Pandemic Plan - which clearly states that it is applicable to any infectious respiratory virus including a SARS virus. Not one journalist or media outlet from the "mainstream" ever questioned our government and health bureaucracies about this. We have a similar "independent" inquiry going on here in NZ (I think? Don't hear much about it) which has similar limitations in that the scope of the inquiry doesn't cover crucial aspects of the Covid "response" here in this country. The outcome is likely to be affirmation and back-patting all round for the lockdown, social isolation, jabbing and masking policy fanatic "experts" trotted out ad infinitum and ad nauseum who caused so much damage. Just like in the UK and elsewhere.
Here goes, written on 22nd October. Reply received and already posted here.
Lady Hallett
UK Covid-19 Inquiry
Dear Lady Hallett and UK Covid-19 Inquiry team,
I hereby want to lodge an official complaint about the proceedings of the UK Covid- 19 Inquiry.
The reason for the complaint is the profound bias noted during the Inquiry on Thursday 19th of October 2023.
I was particularly interested in the proceedings of this day because on this day Prof. Carl Heneghan was going to give evidence.
I have read to the whole transcript of the 19th of October and to say I am shocked it so put it mildly. I probably was naive in thinking that this inquiry was going to be unbiased, but nothing is further from the truth if these proceedings are anything to go by.
My observations:
- First of all, the KC asks leading questions, especially of prof. Noakes and prof. Edmunds- guiding them towards answers which show how marvellous their work was, how good the lockdowns were (and they should have started sooner).
- Then there is the questioning of prof. Heneghan....The KC starts to try and diminish prof. Heneghan’s credentials and then proceeds to ask questions about the Great Barrington Declaration which prof. Heneghan did not sign (I did by the way) and refuses to listen to his reasoning why and actually tries to trip him up and interrupts him all the time. I am really surprised prof. Heneghan kept his cool.
- To ask prof. Heneghan about the unprofessional comments made by Dame McClean, is completely inappropriate in an Inquiry.
- Prof. Heneghan’s session was too short to get any meaningful evidence.
- Further bias is shown by Lady Hallett as she sings the full praises of both prof. Noakes and Edmunds. This is unnecessary from an independent chair, especially as there was no such praise for prof. Heneghan.
So where to go from here? I am really unsure, but of one thing I am sure that in its present format this Inquiry is not going to achieve anything useful. Unless the Inquiry is completely unbiassed and asks difficult questions, it will be a waste of public money. Is there any way to change the direction of the Inquiry? Have previous Inquiries been criticised and stopped? I would certainly want a counter to the current KC, asking intelligent, scientific and challenging questions rather than the current KC’s cooing over the splendid pandemic response.
I further hope that prof. Carl Heneghan’s written testimony will be given due consideration. I have found him to be a scientist of the highest integrity. He won’t compromise and won’t give yes/no answers until he is highly certain. In medical evidence there are often grey areas, where no simple answers exist. That is why it was clear that council on that day failed to understand Prof. Carl Heneghan.
I sincerely hope to get an answer to my complaint and that it is taken into consideration.
I agree, however, nobody will read your complaint and if you’re lucky, you may receive an AI generated reply. Just look at how Andrew Bridgen was dismissed by his colleagues when discussing excess deaths. The establishment don’t care about the “useless eaters” we are a fly on the windscreen to them.
The worst form of gaslighting I have encountered for a while..
I have asked them to escalate the complaint.
“ Thank you for your email of 23 October to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry regarding your views on the questioning of witnesses by Counsel to the Inquiry at the Inquiry’s public hearings.
The Inquiry is required by statute to be impartial and has no agenda, political or otherwise. It has the legal powers provided by the Inquiries Act 2005, and is able to compel organisations to produce documents to it and witnesses to give evidence.
The Inquiry collects a huge quantity of evidence in the form of statements from witnesses and other documents in order to cover all aspects of its Terms of Reference. It takes into account lines of enquiry on which it has sought legal submissions from Core Participants. Witnesses are called to give oral testimony based on the requirements of the module hearings. The Inquiry will maintain its independence at all times, and it has as yet reached no conclusions on any matter currently under consideration.
Counsel to the Inquiry’s task is both to bring out a witness' evidence and also to test it. The precise way they do that might vary from witness to witness and depend on the evidence, but it is not indicative of any view of that evidence by them or the Inquiry's Chair. Counsel to the Inquiry endeavour to examine all witnesses fairly and give them a fair opportunity to explain their involvement in events.
The Inquiry will only express its view on the evidence it has heard when the Chair publishes her reports. The Chair will produce regular reports during the course of the Inquiry, and the first of these relating to Module 1 (the nation’s resilience and preparedness for the pandemic) is expected to be published in the summer next year.
For the latest on the Inquiry, please check the UK Covid-19 Inquiry website. You may also wish to subscribe to our newsletter to receive regular updates via email.
For specific information about the Inquiry’s hearings, including upcoming witnesses, you can subscribe to our weekly hearing updates on our website. Please note that this is separate to the newsletter and you do not need to sign up to the newsletter to receive these weekly hearing updates.
And I have asked them to escalate my complaint as this is the worst form of gaslighting I have encountered for a while…
“Thank you for your email of 23 October to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry regarding your views on the questioning of witnesses by Counsel to the Inquiry at the Inquiry’s public hearings.
The Inquiry is required by statute to be impartial and has no agenda, political or otherwise. It has the legal powers provided by the Inquiries Act 2005, and is able to compel organisations to produce documents to it and witnesses to give evidence.
The Inquiry collects a huge quantity of evidence in the form of statements from witnesses and other documents in order to cover all aspects of its Terms of Reference. It takes into account lines of enquiry on which it has sought legal submissions from Core Participants. Witnesses are called to give oral testimony based on the requirements of the module hearings. The Inquiry will maintain its independence at all times, and it has as yet reached no conclusions on any matter currently under consideration.
Counsel to the Inquiry’s task is both to bring out a witness' evidence and also to test it. The precise way they do that might vary from witness to witness and depend on the evidence, but it is not indicative of any view of that evidence by them or the Inquiry's Chair. Counsel to the Inquiry endeavour to examine all witnesses fairly and give them a fair opportunity to explain their involvement in events.
The Inquiry will only express its view on the evidence it has heard when the Chair publishes her reports. The Chair will produce regular reports during the course of the Inquiry, and the first of these relating to Module 1 (the nation’s resilience and preparedness for the pandemic) is expected to be published in the summer next year.
For the latest on the Inquiry, please check the UK Covid-19 Inquiry website. You may also wish to subscribe to our newsletter to receive regular updates via email.
For specific information about the Inquiry’s hearings, including upcoming witnesses, you can subscribe to our weekly hearing updates on our website. Please note that this is separate to the newsletter and you do not need to sign up to the newsletter to receive these weekly hearing updates.
We all knew that the Covid-19 Inquiry would turn out to be an establishment whitewash, just like everything else associated with the Covid “plandemic”.
Winston Churchill refused to allow a Bank Holiday for the Queen’s coronation in 1953 because of the immense costs to shut down the economy for one day.. How many days was the economy shut down for in 2020? And just don’t get me started on masks, jabs, the damage to children, mental health issues. The treatment of Carl Heneghan is just appalling. Science has been completely hijacked but who would have honestly believed that they were going to put up their hands and admit they got it so catastrophically wrong?
The lockdowns is a well known prison term to jail its population. It did just that based on false evidence like masks. This was based on unscientific consensus, harms they knew nothing about and the best of all the vaccine which isn’t a vaccine but a gene therapy tell you all you need to know on how revolutionary or not in this case the people or sheeple followed. One’s own immunity like mine fought it off in what I termed flu on turbo charge. Stay away from medicines unless it’s absolutely critical you need them because the pharma industry is to make profits and keep you hooked.
I couldn't agree with you more and your spoiler alert was spot on. That's almost certainly what the whitewash, sorry the "inquiry", will conclude. It's all coming down to the bad guys (Heneghan etc) not considered to have enough expertise and the good guys (the appalling and repeatedly wrong Ferguson and his ilk) saying "we're the experts but don't blame us it wasn't our fault" .... when in many ways that's exactly what it was, their fault
Vested interests, arse covering and misaligned incentives are nowhere better to be seen in flagrante than in this hopeless extended whitewash. Sweden got it right. We got it wrong. Our politics, media, academia and probably our legal system are hopelessly compromised.
Sweden still got the vax decision wrong! It doesn't work and never did. It's dangerous and comes with absolutely no guarantee of Safety and efficacy. It's Gene Therapy so all participants are now Genetically Modified! All Governments had to sign CONTRACTS with Pfizer etc, to accept all LIABILITY for thousands of DEATHS caused by the 'Experimental VAX'.
Any analysis of conduct has to be based on what we knew at the time. Giving a vaccine to old and vulnerable people based on a risk reward assessment also led Sweden to not give it to the vast number of people at nearly no risk. The lesser of two weevils as they used to say in the navy...
The corruption in science and government seems to be beyond repair.
If it can't be critiqued how can we fix the problems? We cannot. The West is doomed.
These fools will be patting themselves on the back while wondering why there is no money to deal with the tragedy of our kids poor mental health, or the hospital waiting lists or any of the countless other problems caused by the covid over response.
It’s odd that nobody sought to reference the detailed analysis that staff at WHO conducted & published second half 2019 that none of the so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as masking, mass testing, lockdowns, workplace & school closures, border restrictions etc have the slightest effect on epidemic spreading of acute respiratory illnesses (widely assumed to have been caused by respiratory viruses, when there is little evidence for this, it being a presumption, interestingly enough).
This damning WHO scientific report was issued to the public health functions of every one of its member states in autumn 2019. So it’s not as if it’d been so old that new staff weren’t aware of it.
The report was over 100 pages long and I found it only by using the Wayback Machine. WHO has deleted it from its website. I last had a copy in 2021. I do not have anything approaching a filing system, unfortunately. Way too disorganized for that, sorry.
Well the WHO's conclusion from their analyses that border restrictions don't have the slightest effect on epidemic spreading of acute respiratory illnesses doesn't appear to have been borne out in Western Australia which had the world's longest border closure. There was negligible covid there until they opened the border. The health sytem, though, was overwhelmed after the shots were rolled out, prior to the border beingopened
Once a virus enters a population the is nothing than can be done except for the time honored isolation of the sick, quarantine of those who came in contact with the sick or returning from areas known to have the virus and let everyone else go about their lives. However, if borders are shut before the virus gets in, nothing else is necessary.
Apology accepted but a pity nevertheless! Would have been nice to have that report circulating alongside the Inquiry. The Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation might have loved to receive a copy... then again, probably not.
You only need to look at the utter disgrace that was Julian Assange's extradition trial. Evidence refused, and a thoroughly pre-ordained outcome. The English legal system has been a disgrace for a number of years. We are truly on our own. Organise and mobilise. We need to beat the bastards.
I assumed it would be so before it started, so no surprise. How could the political class and their medical and scientific advisors allow the truth to come out? In this case you just have to note who funds many of our institutions and media. The remit of all enquiries is such as to avoid the core issues that might look bad for the ruling class.
It follows on from the Iraq Enquiry - "No sexed up dodgy dossier here, guv" and the enquiry that Dr David Kelly died by his own hand ( which has been shown to be very highly dubious by several relevant expert opinions, detailed extensively by Miles Goslett) and let us not forget that Blair 's Govt ruled no autopsy/PM and the file be closed for 100 years....?
Long ago I came to the conclusion that I have been born into a country that is as morally corrupt as any on this planet; Baroness Hallett's appalling behaviour and that of her so called "Leading" Counsel has only strengthened my conviction.
What did any of us really expect! Of course i'ts going to be a whitewash. They're all covering each others araes. Whether ignorant or complicit, the result is the same. They HAVE to protect themselves. The whole rotten system would collapse if the while truth were k own to the majority. How that the Covid pandemic was a rehearsed and controlled event. Man made virus, man made vaccine. With some added ingredients. That event was supposed to kick-start the 4th industrial revolution, the Great Reset. Ie vax passports and digital currency. The PCR tests were used deliberately to raise "infections". The ventilators killed folk, so did Midazolim. It was planned and executed by the WEF, Mr Klaus Schwab being the main man. Obviously other players involved but Gates and him are pretty high up the ladder.
It's control and eugenics basically. I know how powerful pharma is. It's money controls all the medical institutes. Dogmatised. They nearly had us.
Then came Ukraine....
Now it's Israel WW3.
Ultimate distractions as we were quickly finding out what was going on behind the centuries old charade which is our monarchy and government. And our lives... cheers.
Agreed. If one thinks about it, which people clearly do not, even much vaunted experts, it would be all but inconceivable that they’d really release an engineered pathogen into the world they also live in.
The main reason is unpredictability of outcome. They couldn’t be sure how large human populations would be affected. It might burn out & disappear, at least from whole regions, or it might be more serious than they’d expected and collapse global supply chains. The probability it’d do what the perpetrators wanted, burn steadily for months, is a low likelihood event.
The oversight committee would learn of this by interrogating it’s own experts and conclude the risks of losing control one way or the other was unacceptably high.
Imagine the next interaction with the committee. “You’ll recall our last interaction. Well, we’ve got a new plan. It’s exactly the same as the last plan except we don’t release a pathogen, we just tell everyone that we have (at least, that there’s a new & scary pathogen on the lose)”.
Add a deliberately useless diagnostic test and you have your highly controlled pandemic of very few “moving parts”.
They did collapse global supply chains. The disease didn’t but lockdowns surely did. In rich countries, the shortages thus caused are being seen as higher prices but in poorer regions, many products simply are not available.
Thanks Mike, I've been on this from the outset. And in agreement, I used to say regarding chemtrails, why would they be doing it to themselves? The reason I suspected a "real" virus was when I saw a video of a Dr describing this furin cleavage site. Sounds like porn lol. I'm a layman, engineer but with emotion and passion for interesting subjects. Anhway, this furin site was NOT a natural evolution. Veneticakly modified onvo. And the "antidote" was the spike protein in the vax. Am i talkng nonsense? It was develiped to a Moderna(CIA) patent for the "vax" for it. Wished I had saved links. Bob Malone may be a white hat. He's CIA but a good guy. Faucis evil. He's a huge part. An evil puppet for the real string pullers. The WEF are in it. Israel, Jesuits. Muslim Brotherhood, China, Russia.
Klaus allying and aligning with the techy world of which Musk is God. They both have visons of eternal life, Schwab as an occultist, Elon as a transhumanist. Its Yin and Yan. Dr Evil and Austin Powers. The battle rumbles on. Ukraine now Gaza. In my opinion to distract is from covid. To go back, there was a young German Dr who very shortly sfter the jabs came out detected graphine in them. He published this on his YouTube channel and the next night, live, he was raided and arrested. He died in Police custody the next day. He had served for a year, recently, under the top UK expert in graphene who was based at a pharma research station in Durham. Lots of pharma round there. Funnily enough that's where Doninic Cummins went for a "haircut" during lockdown.
Then what about the self assembling nano tech. Circuitry? Maybe that's why they wanted EVERY human on the planet jabbed. Some sort of electronic marker, activated by waves of whatever description. Some say 5g. Even just to identify us. Or worse. But what's with the other stuff they're finding in it. Is it a multi pronged attack on us just with the vax. only are certain people warned NOT to take it? I remember Boris saying early on, may the best immune system win, so he knew it was mild or bogus. So much misinformation and disinformation that's its hard to objectively sort it out. This is literally The Great Reset whether we luke it or not. I fear for us. I'm 20 miles from a major UN nuclear supply dump, inside a fucking mountain. In Scotland.
Have a look at Deagel 2025 if it's still up on the Web. This is the real deal Mike, I'm 63, been on this trail for decades, even now the "ignorance is bliss" adage is useless. Because its affecting ALL of us in some way, usually negative. Here's hoping love overcomes hate. Yin and Yan. The great battle. Love vs Hate
It's also pure primal/tribal power hungry, machismo arien race shit. Survival of the fittest. Only winners, no losers. The end justifies the means. To improve the planet for the best. And get rid if the useless eaters. Very draconian, the reptile side of us.... who'll win?
I think some people will survive. It’s very difficult to take everyone to slavery or death.
I am as sure as a scientist allows himself to be that the injections sole purpose is to injure, be that maiming, killing, reducing fertility.
I’m sceptical about nano tech in an injection. Secret technology no doubt exists but I don’t think they’ve discovered how to do more or less impossible things. And they’re not needed. Old fashioned fear & fear of violence will keep most silent, even when they know they ought to fight back and if they were braver, they would.
It’d not over by any means because so few they’ve only broken things.
Once things get convergent, it’ll be easier to see what exactly they’re aiming at.
I do sense great evil. What’s being done is in no way necessary.
The stories of overpopulation and running out of oil are lies, imo. Just as climate emergency is & rampant viruses are.
I don't sense evil, I sense men and women who feel that a new Grand Solution is required. To depopulate the planet, making it better for the wealthy and entitled. Musk says we need more people. What for? There are NO jobs for the endless amount of kids coming out of colleges and universities as it is. His factories are "manned" by robots!
Back to the "tech" inside the vaccines. Why is there graphene in them. Self assembling! The young German scientist who died in Police custody was revealing important information from the outset. He knew something, he died for it. He had served(sorry if I'm repeating, but its important) under the top UK expert at a pharma research centre in Durham for a year befoe covid broke out.
What did he know?
Again, the question, why every person in the planet? A marker. Remember this was a pretext for vax passports or digital I.d.
The Great Reset.
Eugenics.
Transhumanism.
All very disturbing, especially when there's NO transparency. They're doing it to us whether we luke it or not. They ARE the higher power in their own eyes.
Hi again Mike, I've just been looking at this from another angle. Let's face it, we know the bankers are involved in all of this somehow, they always are. This kind "money" guy, linked below puts it in a different perspective.
Was Covid just a huge money grab, AND to prop up the failing debt ridden fiat system?
When that failed to fully develope they then have to add war to boost the money system and keep it fluid.
Just another theory to throw in the pot. I feel its pretty accurate and relates to what's happening. We've always known wars were bankers wars!!
I definitely agree that the money system at its highest level is a major driver of numerous plots, including this one (covid / vax etc)
Unfortunately it’s definitely about more than money simply from the design of the injections. Their intention is massed illness and death.
Add to this (1) numerous new factories to manufacture huge numbers of mRNA injections, (2) the fact that ALL mRNA injections are toxic, and the announcements that (3) our governments have agreed to buy enough jabs to inject each of us TEN further times, cannot be interpreted as other than an intention to kill a very high percentage of the global population.
Like you I have developed subterranean scepticism for years, and that has increased exponentially since 2008. Drs Martin and Malone have covered in massive detail, with the latter Dr more recently going much further than he has done previously, how the US Military and Intelligence regimes developed their bioweapons technology. We are all paying the price for that right now.
Classic CIA - is there anyone on this planet that does not conclude that these Untouchables ( perhaps in cahoots with a wider cohort but still effectively CIA operations ) killed JFK ( and his brother )? Oliver Stone has gone about as far as you can go publicly to destroy the Warren Commission - and he knows more than he can show for certain.
David Martin has exposed how Fauci directed US taxpayer funding, via fraudulent patent assignments involving US Universities, via Daszak/Baric/WIV to develop the DARPA programme for US bioweapon, gain of function enhancing research; I am no scientist but even I can follow those breadcrumbs and if "cui bono" is the litmus test, who else benefits (apart from the overtly criminal BigPharma cartel)? Who else has the logistical planning expertise to coordinate all aspects of SARS COV2/mRNA jab programme - WEF? ( Never ); Gates? (He is a CIA goon); Farrar et al? ( Where is the track record...); WHO ( which is controlled by...)
The CIA's position on population is already well known and documented. It occurs to me that they have encouraged/induced/allowed certain "actors" to benefit - US/UK/EU/OZNZ Health quangos, Medicine regulators and "others" have attached themselves as remoras - by acting as puppets. I think the ultra far left woke Marxists that have populated western public sector ( they could hardly promote their schtick in the private sector ) have used the scamdemic to scale up their activities such that they no longer are subversive out of the public eye; what "they" have been doing for decades is now in plain sight. It is like the 1920's/30's in Russia after the 1917 revolution - emboldened by "success", they unleashed the terror...
Part of me thinks SARS COV2 is a rehearsal for something much much bigger. Accordingly, I know that historic life expectancy actuarial assumptions are just dust; I no longer trust ANYONE; I despise the left in a manner I cannot express on these pages for fear of being removed; I have no faith, NONE, in anyone still operating within the UK Health sector ( and having been to "the other side" twice only to come back by two miracles, I know exactly what that means for me, my family and anyone else who is no longer prepared to be a "crash test dummy" ).
What next? No idea but I will fight to my last breath - "Cry havoc " and all that....
Very eloquently put my friend. And I agree almost wholeheartedly. I have many other overlapping theories as well, I usually keep them to myself.
ne of my theories is that this all came about as we, the planet collectively, were(online and therfore in the human psyche(if enough people "believe") becoming more knowledgeable about the corruption at the dizzy heights of our "controlling" network. The bankers, the corporate CEO's, the big shareholders, the political and military big hitters.
All of them "fighting" for control of power and "finance" is in their armoury. Its about to collapse in the "west" right enough....War keeps the money flowing. Fact!
So, .to summarise, a lot more if us know the score. We distrust the system, man's lust for power and money destroys everything. Its primal.
What's the way out? Wow! Not enough people ate at the same "level" of awareness. You and I are fairly high up looking down on the masses, much like the "elite" do but we're still part of the useless eaters. Same metaphor.
The elite look down with glee and satisfaction(fear of being "caught" now too) whilst we look down with sorrow and compassion.
Can we ever combat the medieval religions which dominate our psyche. Not mine, I'm an atheist but also have a very open mind. Even in quantum physics terms "anything is possible".
Anyway, peace out. Love is the key but hey, we're still just animals with imagination!!
I'm 63, loved through the best times. 👌
Enjoy freedom NOW while you still can. For me that means going out on my 170mph motorbike and feeling alive, being close to death.
Or playing in my rock'n'roll band and bonding with fellow musicians and audience blasting out good music from the heart.
Whatever you do, do it now, LIVE FREE while we still can..
And SPEAK FREELY because they're coming for us on that front too..
All good news, 😆
Ignorance must be bliss. Down on that lower rung of the awareness ladder. 😌
Part of my “ therapy” is to “strap on the Strat” …. Not ( yet…..? ) skilled enough or brave enough to play live…. Have an ace tutor when he is well - making sense of scales and chords and still thinking how the hell did Django do with two fingers what I cannot with four ffs!!!
Isn't there evidence referred to by RFK Jr that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered to target different haplogroups differently? If i recall correctly, it's claimed that it causes severe illness in enemies of the US such as Russia and, especially, Iran while having only mild effects on groups of people friendly to the US, at least in the middle east?
He said that they "could be working on pathogens for specific races" but just being hypothetical and not refering to Sarscov2 specifically. They were doing a lot of this research all over Ukraine which Putin kindly bulldozed for Biden and his son, as they were balls deep in the countries corruption. Anyway, I digress, but its all connected. To globalism, the NWO 2.0.
The Russians reported what they found to the UN Secutity Council. The UkroNazis had destroyed plenty of Evidence but they found enough to indicate the the US was doing a shitload of banned bioweapons development and targeting Eastern Slavs while using Ukranians as guinea pigs. Biden Jr was funding the bioweapons development.
and not just upend but literally kill off and or mame its citizens via the vaccines and medazolam etc... in the care homes under the directive of ‘medazolam Matt.’
As a solicitor I absolutely agree.
The Inquiry is a joke which should be put to sleep asap.
Sadly Clown World has taken over the legal system.
Lady Hallett, you are an utter disgrace to the judicial system. The RPTB chose you well.
The way you allowed Carl Heneghan to be cross examined was utterly appalling.
THINK!
This inquiry is a disgrace and an insult to anyone with a brain. Further the solicitor who interviewed Dr. Carl Heneghan, should be removed from the inquiry immediately, but first he must offer Dr. Carl Hennighan an apology. We are wasting.
The inquiry was doomed to fail because it is headed by f*ckwits. The English legal system is a joke, the laughing stock of the world. Unless headed by a Chair with a knowledge of the principles of philosophy of science, scientific methodology and scientific reasoning, any inquiry would be a waste of time; a gravy train for lawyers making money at public expense. The whole world knows that the English legal system is a farce and corrupt.
No, it's not. The English health care and? Legal system, certified that I was 15 pc disabled from the mandatory Hep B vaccination I was forced to have as a healthcare worker. They stated in a letter that it was the trigger for the disability. Unfortunately, I could not get compensation from the NHS employer because the legal system could not find an expert witness who was willing to testify.
Maybe you're right..
The system works. It's done what it is intended to do. It's created the appearance of justice without the reality and it's covered the arse of the powers that be. An expert witness who is willing to testify almost certainly exists somewhere. Unfortunately, you'd need at least the wealth of a Matt Hancock or another of your betters l to afford them. Rule Brittania, Brittania waives the rules. Britons forever and ever and ever will be slaves.
Excellent essay. This confirms my maxim that every important "truth-seeking" organization in the world is captured. The truth can't break through when 100 percent of the key actors are blocking it.
All the heavy lifting is going to have to be done by the non-captured smaller organizations (including Substack's contrarian writers). We can write off the official truth-seekers.
There's a Bill Rice Jr. Substack article on this topic ...
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/i-blame-the-captured-mainstream-media?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
I have written a letter of complaint after Thursday’s proceedings.
I was shocked to read the transcript.
So either the inquiry should be stopped now if this level of bias continues. It would save an awful lot of money,
Or, the inquiry’s Mr. Keith is replaced by someone who asks the difficult questions, including the most important one:
Taking into account the WHO always dismissed lockdowns because these were too harmful, why did they think lockdowns were a good idea in the first place?
Nobody seems to be wanting to answer this question (if it ever gets asked) - what was it that led to the established, science and experienced backed pandemic plans, with associated ethical guidelines, being cast aside in favour of experimental lockdown strategies imported from China? Why was there felt a need to "reinvent the wheel"? Here in New Zealand when this utter shambles kicked off our then-Prime Minister announced that there was "no playbook" for dealing with this situation. Yes there was -the NZ Influenza Pandemic Plan - which clearly states that it is applicable to any infectious respiratory virus including a SARS virus. Not one journalist or media outlet from the "mainstream" ever questioned our government and health bureaucracies about this. We have a similar "independent" inquiry going on here in NZ (I think? Don't hear much about it) which has similar limitations in that the scope of the inquiry doesn't cover crucial aspects of the Covid "response" here in this country. The outcome is likely to be affirmation and back-patting all round for the lockdown, social isolation, jabbing and masking policy fanatic "experts" trotted out ad infinitum and ad nauseum who caused so much damage. Just like in the UK and elsewhere.
There was a dress rehearsal of the masking and lock downs enacted named Event 201 by Bill Gates in October 2019
But Trish Professor Baker has shown that we saved 20 thousand lives! It's The Science!
I'm sure if he can tweak his model right we will see that New Zealand's covid response actually saved all of the humans in recorded history.
MBE's all round.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/new-zealand-records-biggest-increase-in-registered-deaths-in-100-years/BQERSTKIANCKRNNA7IL42RD52U/
The aim was to trash the economy. It's all about the money. It's always all about the money. Lockdowns worked for that.
thank you for writing the letter. If you were up for sharing it with us we could turn it into a CTA, perhaps?
Here goes, written on 22nd October. Reply received and already posted here.
Lady Hallett
UK Covid-19 Inquiry
Dear Lady Hallett and UK Covid-19 Inquiry team,
I hereby want to lodge an official complaint about the proceedings of the UK Covid- 19 Inquiry.
The reason for the complaint is the profound bias noted during the Inquiry on Thursday 19th of October 2023.
I was particularly interested in the proceedings of this day because on this day Prof. Carl Heneghan was going to give evidence.
I have read to the whole transcript of the 19th of October and to say I am shocked it so put it mildly. I probably was naive in thinking that this inquiry was going to be unbiased, but nothing is further from the truth if these proceedings are anything to go by.
My observations:
- First of all, the KC asks leading questions, especially of prof. Noakes and prof. Edmunds- guiding them towards answers which show how marvellous their work was, how good the lockdowns were (and they should have started sooner).
- Then there is the questioning of prof. Heneghan....The KC starts to try and diminish prof. Heneghan’s credentials and then proceeds to ask questions about the Great Barrington Declaration which prof. Heneghan did not sign (I did by the way) and refuses to listen to his reasoning why and actually tries to trip him up and interrupts him all the time. I am really surprised prof. Heneghan kept his cool.
- To ask prof. Heneghan about the unprofessional comments made by Dame McClean, is completely inappropriate in an Inquiry.
- Prof. Heneghan’s session was too short to get any meaningful evidence.
- Further bias is shown by Lady Hallett as she sings the full praises of both prof. Noakes and Edmunds. This is unnecessary from an independent chair, especially as there was no such praise for prof. Heneghan.
So where to go from here? I am really unsure, but of one thing I am sure that in its present format this Inquiry is not going to achieve anything useful. Unless the Inquiry is completely unbiassed and asks difficult questions, it will be a waste of public money. Is there any way to change the direction of the Inquiry? Have previous Inquiries been criticised and stopped? I would certainly want a counter to the current KC, asking intelligent, scientific and challenging questions rather than the current KC’s cooing over the splendid pandemic response.
I further hope that prof. Carl Heneghan’s written testimony will be given due consideration. I have found him to be a scientist of the highest integrity. He won’t compromise and won’t give yes/no answers until he is highly certain. In medical evidence there are often grey areas, where no simple answers exist. That is why it was clear that council on that day failed to understand Prof. Carl Heneghan.
I sincerely hope to get an answer to my complaint and that it is taken into consideration.
Kind regards,
Myra
It won't be because the lawyers and judges involved are there to milk the system they are assigned to protect
I agree, however, nobody will read your complaint and if you’re lucky, you may receive an AI generated reply. Just look at how Andrew Bridgen was dismissed by his colleagues when discussing excess deaths. The establishment don’t care about the “useless eaters” we are a fly on the windscreen to them.
I will keep you updated….
This is the response I got.
The worst form of gaslighting I have encountered for a while..
I have asked them to escalate the complaint.
“ Thank you for your email of 23 October to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry regarding your views on the questioning of witnesses by Counsel to the Inquiry at the Inquiry’s public hearings.
The Inquiry is required by statute to be impartial and has no agenda, political or otherwise. It has the legal powers provided by the Inquiries Act 2005, and is able to compel organisations to produce documents to it and witnesses to give evidence.
The Inquiry collects a huge quantity of evidence in the form of statements from witnesses and other documents in order to cover all aspects of its Terms of Reference. It takes into account lines of enquiry on which it has sought legal submissions from Core Participants. Witnesses are called to give oral testimony based on the requirements of the module hearings. The Inquiry will maintain its independence at all times, and it has as yet reached no conclusions on any matter currently under consideration.
Counsel to the Inquiry’s task is both to bring out a witness' evidence and also to test it. The precise way they do that might vary from witness to witness and depend on the evidence, but it is not indicative of any view of that evidence by them or the Inquiry's Chair. Counsel to the Inquiry endeavour to examine all witnesses fairly and give them a fair opportunity to explain their involvement in events.
The Inquiry will only express its view on the evidence it has heard when the Chair publishes her reports. The Chair will produce regular reports during the course of the Inquiry, and the first of these relating to Module 1 (the nation’s resilience and preparedness for the pandemic) is expected to be published in the summer next year.
For the latest on the Inquiry, please check the UK Covid-19 Inquiry website. You may also wish to subscribe to our newsletter to receive regular updates via email.
For specific information about the Inquiry’s hearings, including upcoming witnesses, you can subscribe to our weekly hearing updates on our website. Please note that this is separate to the newsletter and you do not need to sign up to the newsletter to receive these weekly hearing updates.
Yours sincerely, ”
This is the reply I got…
And I have asked them to escalate my complaint as this is the worst form of gaslighting I have encountered for a while…
“Thank you for your email of 23 October to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry regarding your views on the questioning of witnesses by Counsel to the Inquiry at the Inquiry’s public hearings.
The Inquiry is required by statute to be impartial and has no agenda, political or otherwise. It has the legal powers provided by the Inquiries Act 2005, and is able to compel organisations to produce documents to it and witnesses to give evidence.
The Inquiry collects a huge quantity of evidence in the form of statements from witnesses and other documents in order to cover all aspects of its Terms of Reference. It takes into account lines of enquiry on which it has sought legal submissions from Core Participants. Witnesses are called to give oral testimony based on the requirements of the module hearings. The Inquiry will maintain its independence at all times, and it has as yet reached no conclusions on any matter currently under consideration.
Counsel to the Inquiry’s task is both to bring out a witness' evidence and also to test it. The precise way they do that might vary from witness to witness and depend on the evidence, but it is not indicative of any view of that evidence by them or the Inquiry's Chair. Counsel to the Inquiry endeavour to examine all witnesses fairly and give them a fair opportunity to explain their involvement in events.
The Inquiry will only express its view on the evidence it has heard when the Chair publishes her reports. The Chair will produce regular reports during the course of the Inquiry, and the first of these relating to Module 1 (the nation’s resilience and preparedness for the pandemic) is expected to be published in the summer next year.
For the latest on the Inquiry, please check the UK Covid-19 Inquiry website. You may also wish to subscribe to our newsletter to receive regular updates via email.
For specific information about the Inquiry’s hearings, including upcoming witnesses, you can subscribe to our weekly hearing updates on our website. Please note that this is separate to the newsletter and you do not need to sign up to the newsletter to receive these weekly hearing updates.
Yours sincerely, “
Oh I can answer that one!
Because the WHO is largely financed (specified donations) by the CCP, and the likes of Gates, who has a vested interest in promoting vaccines?
We all knew that the Covid-19 Inquiry would turn out to be an establishment whitewash, just like everything else associated with the Covid “plandemic”.
TCW kindly published my article “My eight simple questions for the Covid Inquiry”, giving my own answers in parentheses. For some reason it was ignored by Baroness Hallett. See https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/my-eight-simple-questions-for-the-covid-inquiry/.
thank you - we have read.
Winston Churchill refused to allow a Bank Holiday for the Queen’s coronation in 1953 because of the immense costs to shut down the economy for one day.. How many days was the economy shut down for in 2020? And just don’t get me started on masks, jabs, the damage to children, mental health issues. The treatment of Carl Heneghan is just appalling. Science has been completely hijacked but who would have honestly believed that they were going to put up their hands and admit they got it so catastrophically wrong?
The lockdowns is a well known prison term to jail its population. It did just that based on false evidence like masks. This was based on unscientific consensus, harms they knew nothing about and the best of all the vaccine which isn’t a vaccine but a gene therapy tell you all you need to know on how revolutionary or not in this case the people or sheeple followed. One’s own immunity like mine fought it off in what I termed flu on turbo charge. Stay away from medicines unless it’s absolutely critical you need them because the pharma industry is to make profits and keep you hooked.
I couldn't agree with you more and your spoiler alert was spot on. That's almost certainly what the whitewash, sorry the "inquiry", will conclude. It's all coming down to the bad guys (Heneghan etc) not considered to have enough expertise and the good guys (the appalling and repeatedly wrong Ferguson and his ilk) saying "we're the experts but don't blame us it wasn't our fault" .... when in many ways that's exactly what it was, their fault
100% agree - thank you.
Vested interests, arse covering and misaligned incentives are nowhere better to be seen in flagrante than in this hopeless extended whitewash. Sweden got it right. We got it wrong. Our politics, media, academia and probably our legal system are hopelessly compromised.
Sweden still got the vax decision wrong! It doesn't work and never did. It's dangerous and comes with absolutely no guarantee of Safety and efficacy. It's Gene Therapy so all participants are now Genetically Modified! All Governments had to sign CONTRACTS with Pfizer etc, to accept all LIABILITY for thousands of DEATHS caused by the 'Experimental VAX'.
That ain't so clever! Mick.
Any analysis of conduct has to be based on what we knew at the time. Giving a vaccine to old and vulnerable people based on a risk reward assessment also led Sweden to not give it to the vast number of people at nearly no risk. The lesser of two weevils as they used to say in the navy...
So, so, utterly, completely, depressing.
The corruption in science and government seems to be beyond repair.
If it can't be critiqued how can we fix the problems? We cannot. The West is doomed.
These fools will be patting themselves on the back while wondering why there is no money to deal with the tragedy of our kids poor mental health, or the hospital waiting lists or any of the countless other problems caused by the covid over response.
Not wodering why no money to deal with the tragedy. Will be v glad of that as those tragedies will result in more useless eaters dying all in the plan
It’s odd that nobody sought to reference the detailed analysis that staff at WHO conducted & published second half 2019 that none of the so-called non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as masking, mass testing, lockdowns, workplace & school closures, border restrictions etc have the slightest effect on epidemic spreading of acute respiratory illnesses (widely assumed to have been caused by respiratory viruses, when there is little evidence for this, it being a presumption, interestingly enough).
This damning WHO scientific report was issued to the public health functions of every one of its member states in autumn 2019. So it’s not as if it’d been so old that new staff weren’t aware of it.
The report was over 100 pages long and I found it only by using the Wayback Machine. WHO has deleted it from its website. I last had a copy in 2021. I do not have anything approaching a filing system, unfortunately. Way too disorganized for that, sorry.
No matter, you could share copies, if you still had it, and it would be dismissed out of hand.
Well the WHO's conclusion from their analyses that border restrictions don't have the slightest effect on epidemic spreading of acute respiratory illnesses doesn't appear to have been borne out in Western Australia which had the world's longest border closure. There was negligible covid there until they opened the border. The health sytem, though, was overwhelmed after the shots were rolled out, prior to the border beingopened
Once a virus enters a population the is nothing than can be done except for the time honored isolation of the sick, quarantine of those who came in contact with the sick or returning from areas known to have the virus and let everyone else go about their lives. However, if borders are shut before the virus gets in, nothing else is necessary.
Apology accepted but a pity nevertheless! Would have been nice to have that report circulating alongside the Inquiry. The Chief Scientist at the World Health Organisation might have loved to receive a copy... then again, probably not.
You only need to look at the utter disgrace that was Julian Assange's extradition trial. Evidence refused, and a thoroughly pre-ordained outcome. The English legal system has been a disgrace for a number of years. We are truly on our own. Organise and mobilise. We need to beat the bastards.
I assumed it would be so before it started, so no surprise. How could the political class and their medical and scientific advisors allow the truth to come out? In this case you just have to note who funds many of our institutions and media. The remit of all enquiries is such as to avoid the core issues that might look bad for the ruling class.
It follows on from the Iraq Enquiry - "No sexed up dodgy dossier here, guv" and the enquiry that Dr David Kelly died by his own hand ( which has been shown to be very highly dubious by several relevant expert opinions, detailed extensively by Miles Goslett) and let us not forget that Blair 's Govt ruled no autopsy/PM and the file be closed for 100 years....?
Long ago I came to the conclusion that I have been born into a country that is as morally corrupt as any on this planet; Baroness Hallett's appalling behaviour and that of her so called "Leading" Counsel has only strengthened my conviction.
She is not fit to be chair.
She's an incompetent manipulated Puppet! Mick.
What did any of us really expect! Of course i'ts going to be a whitewash. They're all covering each others araes. Whether ignorant or complicit, the result is the same. They HAVE to protect themselves. The whole rotten system would collapse if the while truth were k own to the majority. How that the Covid pandemic was a rehearsed and controlled event. Man made virus, man made vaccine. With some added ingredients. That event was supposed to kick-start the 4th industrial revolution, the Great Reset. Ie vax passports and digital currency. The PCR tests were used deliberately to raise "infections". The ventilators killed folk, so did Midazolim. It was planned and executed by the WEF, Mr Klaus Schwab being the main man. Obviously other players involved but Gates and him are pretty high up the ladder.
It's control and eugenics basically. I know how powerful pharma is. It's money controls all the medical institutes. Dogmatised. They nearly had us.
Then came Ukraine....
Now it's Israel WW3.
Ultimate distractions as we were quickly finding out what was going on behind the centuries old charade which is our monarchy and government. And our lives... cheers.
Agreed. If one thinks about it, which people clearly do not, even much vaunted experts, it would be all but inconceivable that they’d really release an engineered pathogen into the world they also live in.
The main reason is unpredictability of outcome. They couldn’t be sure how large human populations would be affected. It might burn out & disappear, at least from whole regions, or it might be more serious than they’d expected and collapse global supply chains. The probability it’d do what the perpetrators wanted, burn steadily for months, is a low likelihood event.
The oversight committee would learn of this by interrogating it’s own experts and conclude the risks of losing control one way or the other was unacceptably high.
Imagine the next interaction with the committee. “You’ll recall our last interaction. Well, we’ve got a new plan. It’s exactly the same as the last plan except we don’t release a pathogen, we just tell everyone that we have (at least, that there’s a new & scary pathogen on the lose)”.
Add a deliberately useless diagnostic test and you have your highly controlled pandemic of very few “moving parts”.
They did collapse global supply chains. The disease didn’t but lockdowns surely did. In rich countries, the shortages thus caused are being seen as higher prices but in poorer regions, many products simply are not available.
Thanks Mike, I've been on this from the outset. And in agreement, I used to say regarding chemtrails, why would they be doing it to themselves? The reason I suspected a "real" virus was when I saw a video of a Dr describing this furin cleavage site. Sounds like porn lol. I'm a layman, engineer but with emotion and passion for interesting subjects. Anhway, this furin site was NOT a natural evolution. Veneticakly modified onvo. And the "antidote" was the spike protein in the vax. Am i talkng nonsense? It was develiped to a Moderna(CIA) patent for the "vax" for it. Wished I had saved links. Bob Malone may be a white hat. He's CIA but a good guy. Faucis evil. He's a huge part. An evil puppet for the real string pullers. The WEF are in it. Israel, Jesuits. Muslim Brotherhood, China, Russia.
Klaus allying and aligning with the techy world of which Musk is God. They both have visons of eternal life, Schwab as an occultist, Elon as a transhumanist. Its Yin and Yan. Dr Evil and Austin Powers. The battle rumbles on. Ukraine now Gaza. In my opinion to distract is from covid. To go back, there was a young German Dr who very shortly sfter the jabs came out detected graphine in them. He published this on his YouTube channel and the next night, live, he was raided and arrested. He died in Police custody the next day. He had served for a year, recently, under the top UK expert in graphene who was based at a pharma research station in Durham. Lots of pharma round there. Funnily enough that's where Doninic Cummins went for a "haircut" during lockdown.
Then what about the self assembling nano tech. Circuitry? Maybe that's why they wanted EVERY human on the planet jabbed. Some sort of electronic marker, activated by waves of whatever description. Some say 5g. Even just to identify us. Or worse. But what's with the other stuff they're finding in it. Is it a multi pronged attack on us just with the vax. only are certain people warned NOT to take it? I remember Boris saying early on, may the best immune system win, so he knew it was mild or bogus. So much misinformation and disinformation that's its hard to objectively sort it out. This is literally The Great Reset whether we luke it or not. I fear for us. I'm 20 miles from a major UN nuclear supply dump, inside a fucking mountain. In Scotland.
Have a look at Deagel 2025 if it's still up on the Web. This is the real deal Mike, I'm 63, been on this trail for decades, even now the "ignorance is bliss" adage is useless. Because its affecting ALL of us in some way, usually negative. Here's hoping love overcomes hate. Yin and Yan. The great battle. Love vs Hate
It's also pure primal/tribal power hungry, machismo arien race shit. Survival of the fittest. Only winners, no losers. The end justifies the means. To improve the planet for the best. And get rid if the useless eaters. Very draconian, the reptile side of us.... who'll win?
I think some people will survive. It’s very difficult to take everyone to slavery or death.
I am as sure as a scientist allows himself to be that the injections sole purpose is to injure, be that maiming, killing, reducing fertility.
I’m sceptical about nano tech in an injection. Secret technology no doubt exists but I don’t think they’ve discovered how to do more or less impossible things. And they’re not needed. Old fashioned fear & fear of violence will keep most silent, even when they know they ought to fight back and if they were braver, they would.
It’d not over by any means because so few they’ve only broken things.
Once things get convergent, it’ll be easier to see what exactly they’re aiming at.
I do sense great evil. What’s being done is in no way necessary.
The stories of overpopulation and running out of oil are lies, imo. Just as climate emergency is & rampant viruses are.
I don't sense evil, I sense men and women who feel that a new Grand Solution is required. To depopulate the planet, making it better for the wealthy and entitled. Musk says we need more people. What for? There are NO jobs for the endless amount of kids coming out of colleges and universities as it is. His factories are "manned" by robots!
Back to the "tech" inside the vaccines. Why is there graphene in them. Self assembling! The young German scientist who died in Police custody was revealing important information from the outset. He knew something, he died for it. He had served(sorry if I'm repeating, but its important) under the top UK expert at a pharma research centre in Durham for a year befoe covid broke out.
What did he know?
Again, the question, why every person in the planet? A marker. Remember this was a pretext for vax passports or digital I.d.
The Great Reset.
Eugenics.
Transhumanism.
All very disturbing, especially when there's NO transparency. They're doing it to us whether we luke it or not. They ARE the higher power in their own eyes.
Strange New World. 🤔✌️❤️🏴
Hi again Mike, I've just been looking at this from another angle. Let's face it, we know the bankers are involved in all of this somehow, they always are. This kind "money" guy, linked below puts it in a different perspective.
Was Covid just a huge money grab, AND to prop up the failing debt ridden fiat system?
When that failed to fully develope they then have to add war to boost the money system and keep it fluid.
Just another theory to throw in the pot. I feel its pretty accurate and relates to what's happening. We've always known wars were bankers wars!!
https://youtu.be/X3j2gUlPf4w?si=lbQZWFKjuPj38n1x
I definitely agree that the money system at its highest level is a major driver of numerous plots, including this one (covid / vax etc)
Unfortunately it’s definitely about more than money simply from the design of the injections. Their intention is massed illness and death.
Add to this (1) numerous new factories to manufacture huge numbers of mRNA injections, (2) the fact that ALL mRNA injections are toxic, and the announcements that (3) our governments have agreed to buy enough jabs to inject each of us TEN further times, cannot be interpreted as other than an intention to kill a very high percentage of the global population.
Like you I have developed subterranean scepticism for years, and that has increased exponentially since 2008. Drs Martin and Malone have covered in massive detail, with the latter Dr more recently going much further than he has done previously, how the US Military and Intelligence regimes developed their bioweapons technology. We are all paying the price for that right now.
Classic CIA - is there anyone on this planet that does not conclude that these Untouchables ( perhaps in cahoots with a wider cohort but still effectively CIA operations ) killed JFK ( and his brother )? Oliver Stone has gone about as far as you can go publicly to destroy the Warren Commission - and he knows more than he can show for certain.
David Martin has exposed how Fauci directed US taxpayer funding, via fraudulent patent assignments involving US Universities, via Daszak/Baric/WIV to develop the DARPA programme for US bioweapon, gain of function enhancing research; I am no scientist but even I can follow those breadcrumbs and if "cui bono" is the litmus test, who else benefits (apart from the overtly criminal BigPharma cartel)? Who else has the logistical planning expertise to coordinate all aspects of SARS COV2/mRNA jab programme - WEF? ( Never ); Gates? (He is a CIA goon); Farrar et al? ( Where is the track record...); WHO ( which is controlled by...)
The CIA's position on population is already well known and documented. It occurs to me that they have encouraged/induced/allowed certain "actors" to benefit - US/UK/EU/OZNZ Health quangos, Medicine regulators and "others" have attached themselves as remoras - by acting as puppets. I think the ultra far left woke Marxists that have populated western public sector ( they could hardly promote their schtick in the private sector ) have used the scamdemic to scale up their activities such that they no longer are subversive out of the public eye; what "they" have been doing for decades is now in plain sight. It is like the 1920's/30's in Russia after the 1917 revolution - emboldened by "success", they unleashed the terror...
Part of me thinks SARS COV2 is a rehearsal for something much much bigger. Accordingly, I know that historic life expectancy actuarial assumptions are just dust; I no longer trust ANYONE; I despise the left in a manner I cannot express on these pages for fear of being removed; I have no faith, NONE, in anyone still operating within the UK Health sector ( and having been to "the other side" twice only to come back by two miracles, I know exactly what that means for me, my family and anyone else who is no longer prepared to be a "crash test dummy" ).
What next? No idea but I will fight to my last breath - "Cry havoc " and all that....
Very eloquently put my friend. And I agree almost wholeheartedly. I have many other overlapping theories as well, I usually keep them to myself.
ne of my theories is that this all came about as we, the planet collectively, were(online and therfore in the human psyche(if enough people "believe") becoming more knowledgeable about the corruption at the dizzy heights of our "controlling" network. The bankers, the corporate CEO's, the big shareholders, the political and military big hitters.
All of them "fighting" for control of power and "finance" is in their armoury. Its about to collapse in the "west" right enough....War keeps the money flowing. Fact!
So, .to summarise, a lot more if us know the score. We distrust the system, man's lust for power and money destroys everything. Its primal.
What's the way out? Wow! Not enough people ate at the same "level" of awareness. You and I are fairly high up looking down on the masses, much like the "elite" do but we're still part of the useless eaters. Same metaphor.
The elite look down with glee and satisfaction(fear of being "caught" now too) whilst we look down with sorrow and compassion.
Can we ever combat the medieval religions which dominate our psyche. Not mine, I'm an atheist but also have a very open mind. Even in quantum physics terms "anything is possible".
Anyway, peace out. Love is the key but hey, we're still just animals with imagination!!
I'm 63, loved through the best times. 👌
Enjoy freedom NOW while you still can. For me that means going out on my 170mph motorbike and feeling alive, being close to death.
Or playing in my rock'n'roll band and bonding with fellow musicians and audience blasting out good music from the heart.
Whatever you do, do it now, LIVE FREE while we still can..
And SPEAK FREELY because they're coming for us on that front too..
All good news, 😆
Ignorance must be bliss. Down on that lower rung of the awareness ladder. 😌
As they say, once you know....✌️❤️
Part of my “ therapy” is to “strap on the Strat” …. Not ( yet…..? ) skilled enough or brave enough to play live…. Have an ace tutor when he is well - making sense of scales and chords and still thinking how the hell did Django do with two fingers what I cannot with four ffs!!!
Isn't there evidence referred to by RFK Jr that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered to target different haplogroups differently? If i recall correctly, it's claimed that it causes severe illness in enemies of the US such as Russia and, especially, Iran while having only mild effects on groups of people friendly to the US, at least in the middle east?
He said that they "could be working on pathogens for specific races" but just being hypothetical and not refering to Sarscov2 specifically. They were doing a lot of this research all over Ukraine which Putin kindly bulldozed for Biden and his son, as they were balls deep in the countries corruption. Anyway, I digress, but its all connected. To globalism, the NWO 2.0.
The Russians reported what they found to the UN Secutity Council. The UkroNazis had destroyed plenty of Evidence but they found enough to indicate the the US was doing a shitload of banned bioweapons development and targeting Eastern Slavs while using Ukranians as guinea pigs. Biden Jr was funding the bioweapons development.
What always confuses me is that Putin was one of Klaus' Young Global Leaders.. 🤨
Did he just take the "course" out of curiosity, or diplomacy, or is there something more sinister afoot?
SARS-CoV-2 is reportedly much more lethal for Iranians ("Aryans") and other US enemies.
Why was the precautionary principle only applied in one direction ('mitigating covid'), but not the other (the measures)?
The correct 'precaution' would've been not to go utterly insane and upend an entire nation.
quite.
and not just upend but literally kill off and or mame its citizens via the vaccines and medazolam etc... in the care homes under the directive of ‘medazolam Matt.’
Oops, sorry,
typo...meant to type Midazolam...