I have been following you(quietly from the Czech Republic) for some time. I appreciate the incredible work you and your team have put into this and other issues. I hope people take the time to absorb the truth and actively question why the most powerful can undermine the future of so many with their greed and/or inability to take informed decisions.
A huge debt of gratitude once again to Molly and The Us For Them Team, who I am proud to say have followed and supported from the beginning of their campaigning in The U.K. I’m proud to say have just bought a copy of the book and look forward (with a heavy heart of course) to reading it.
Loved this reply! except the naming of Andrew Bridgen, who (especially being degree level qualified in a Science) I believe should have been against all the measures trying to be forced through as soon as it was apparent this whole Covid Charade was a massive Kafkaesque Farce. If I remember correctly? Andrew Bridgen STILL voted for the second lot of Lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations of all Care Home Workers when it was being voted for in The H o C...
That is one take of course on The Bridgen angle argument, however I am aware of plenty of people in ‘The Freedom Movement,’ who question the timing of his genuine integrity and motives (i.e. is it more about covering his professional and moral reputation? - in other words, ‘damage limitation’ - and he is certainly not alone by any means amongst certain professionals and professions doing this wholesale for a while now...)
This is where I think the so-called "Freedom movement" puts me off.... the constant purity tests, the constant takedowns of anyone who tries to engage with political processes, because they must be "shills" or "controlled opposition".
With this attitude the "Freedom movement" will never go mainstream -- which I think betrays a fundamental truth about many of its most radical adherents: they don't want it to go mainstream. They enjoy the fringe and want to stay there.
And that is absolutely fine, but they need to let those of us who *do* care about winning hearts and minds to do our thing.
I want to support Us For Them and campaign groups like Together; I want to respect the MPs and peers who are trying to effect change from within. I don't demand ideological alignment from everyone on every issue, nor will I dismiss their current position just because they had a different one three years ago.
I have been following you(quietly from the Czech Republic) for some time. I appreciate the incredible work you and your team have put into this and other issues. I hope people take the time to absorb the truth and actively question why the most powerful can undermine the future of so many with their greed and/or inability to take informed decisions.
A huge debt of gratitude once again to Molly and The Us For Them Team, who I am proud to say have followed and supported from the beginning of their campaigning in The U.K. I’m proud to say have just bought a copy of the book and look forward (with a heavy heart of course) to reading it.
The question must be, "Where do we go from here?" - does the book discuss that?
You make a good point, and we agree. The final chapter of the book looks to the future and makes recommendations specifically with that in mind.
Just bought the book!
Headline Translation: How to get away with Malfeasance & Criminal Activities with Impunity , get Richer & Continue to plan even more.
Loved this reply! except the naming of Andrew Bridgen, who (especially being degree level qualified in a Science) I believe should have been against all the measures trying to be forced through as soon as it was apparent this whole Covid Charade was a massive Kafkaesque Farce. If I remember correctly? Andrew Bridgen STILL voted for the second lot of Lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations of all Care Home Workers when it was being voted for in The H o C...
That is one take of course on The Bridgen angle argument, however I am aware of plenty of people in ‘The Freedom Movement,’ who question the timing of his genuine integrity and motives (i.e. is it more about covering his professional and moral reputation? - in other words, ‘damage limitation’ - and he is certainly not alone by any means amongst certain professionals and professions doing this wholesale for a while now...)
This is where I think the so-called "Freedom movement" puts me off.... the constant purity tests, the constant takedowns of anyone who tries to engage with political processes, because they must be "shills" or "controlled opposition".
With this attitude the "Freedom movement" will never go mainstream -- which I think betrays a fundamental truth about many of its most radical adherents: they don't want it to go mainstream. They enjoy the fringe and want to stay there.
And that is absolutely fine, but they need to let those of us who *do* care about winning hearts and minds to do our thing.
I want to support Us For Them and campaign groups like Together; I want to respect the MPs and peers who are trying to effect change from within. I don't demand ideological alignment from everyone on every issue, nor will I dismiss their current position just because they had a different one three years ago.