20 Comments

I have never taken medical advice from a politician. Elliot Colburn, a politician appears to

believe, he knows more about covid injections, severe adverse events and deaths post jab than the medical community. Anyone else find this a dangerous approach? Stay in your lane Mr. Colburn and please have the intelligence to maintain an open mind on subjects you know very little about.

Expand full comment

Thanks for highlighting the parliamentary meetings which as you said were ignored by mainstream channels. I listened to Colburn's appallingly insensitive comments comparing people with concerns about vaccine harm to climate change deniers, moon landing deniers and all the rest, which of course made no sense because those things aren't in any way related. And to suggest if you believe one thing you probably believe the others is condescending drivel ... and I'm being generous. He came across like a typical Twitter vaccine zealot, in total denial of anything but the official "nothing to see here" narrative. Thankfully the comments of the other MPs like Chope and Kruger were much more measured and compassionate

Expand full comment

Pleasure -yes I thought the same, genuinely shocked by Colburn's comments.

Expand full comment

I’m not a debater, so someone please explain to me how Elliot Colburn got to be the primary speaker at that ‘debate’ while speaking against the petition? There was far too much inappropriate sales pitch talk from several MPs.

Expand full comment

Agree - and wondered the same, though have so far failed to find out....

Expand full comment

So it seems that only a member of the Petitions Committee can move a motion and open the debate.

https://guidetoprocedure.parliament.uk/articles/fNWtcSks/format-of-petitions-debates

There are 11 members of that committee and Elliot Colburn is one of them.

https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/326/petitions-committee/membership/

The committee member can choose to speak for or against the petition. As annoyed chief defender of the narrative, Elliot Colburn obviously chose to speak against the petition.

It seems that nobody spoke in support of the petition because when he’d finished his speech, the chair said “Nobody from the opposition benches? No.” and went on to take comments from other MPs attending.

I am going to try and clarify whether only another Petitions Committee member is able to oppose the member who opens the debate. I presume that will be the case.

Expand full comment

Yes, tragically Gary you’re right...just to annoy my local community again, I have just posted Molly’s excellent article onto a local community website in Cumbria called ‘Nextdoor’...they (mostly Liberal Democrat councillors) are pushing this totally outdated ‘supposedly safe’ vaccine narrative and there are NHS adverts for Flu and Vaccine Boosters...so every now and then I seem to be the only one who throws a ‘hand grenade’ into their small minded way of thinking by posting National alternatives to the MSM narrative!

Expand full comment

thank you Eloise!

Expand full comment

Thanks for reporting on this important story - especially as the media won't,

Expand full comment

pleasure! had to be done....

Expand full comment

Yes, many thanks indeed Molly for sending on this excellent account of the ‘so called’ debate, which reading between the lines had intentionally been derailed before it had even begun by MP Colburn, who like many MPs clearly needs to go back to remedial lessons on what proper Democracy means - (he probably wouldn’t even be able to explain the origins of where that word comes from - namely the Greek word Demos) - I would also suggest he takes remedial lessons on transparent debate. Never before in this country have I witnessed such an unforgivable and pathetic line up of Parliamentarians both in Government and opposition. We desperately need to overhaul Parliament to restore proper democracy and transparent debate in this country, otherwise I fear for any proper U.K. freedoms and personal safety going forward.

Expand full comment

Couldn't agree more - wholesale constitutional reform is needed, to both Chambers and also how Parliamentary sovereignty overlaps with the rule of law. Another piece, perhaps!

Expand full comment

Many thanks Molly and absolutely another piece! - look forward to it very much and huge thanks once again for everything you’ve done for this country to highlight all the injustices that have taken place and are still taking place. It is like a nightmare that will never end until many more in Government stand up, make a proper National apology and admit that terrible errors and mistakes were made and are still being made in the name of what is essentially ‘Flu’...I think we all know though that will never happen and if it ever does, will not be for literally years to come 🥲

Expand full comment

(and the more people that can grow in numbers to chip away at this propaganda by speaking the truth out loud to people/sending alternative views, then we may have a chance of beginning to turn the tide...)

Expand full comment

"Keep shtum and the electorate might not notice!" That's the WEF message to all subverted Governments. LIABILITY must be reintroduced for ALL deadly medicine and deadly injection makers (called 'vaccines'). Big Pharma have no justifiable reason to avoid responsibility and legal responsibility for the millions of VAX DEATHS they have caused (= DEPOPULATION) using their ridiculous (TEMPORARY) 'IMMUNITY from LIABILITY' which is proving to be a "LICENCE TO KILL".

Also, 'F**k PAYPAL' for 'jumping the gun' without Adolf Schwab's authority, with threats of $2500 fines for customers who dare to criticise the DEADLY injection program set up by the NWO.

Mick from Hooe (UK) Unjabbed and ready!

Expand full comment

Thank you, Molly for this excellent summary of the debate! I've printed it to pdf (in case you get censored, you mischievous truth-spreader, you) and will share widely.

Just a heads-up that there's a broken link: the one to the BMJ article re excess deaths.

And, does anyone know where I can access the full text of the Lancet paper Molly references in the last paragraph: "Big pharma and the UK Government"..? It's behind a paywall and there's no point my subscribing for one article.

Expand full comment

thanks so much Chris - will fix! Lancet link here - https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(06)67943-9/fulltext

Expand full comment

I believe that my wife's stroke was caused by her first injection although it's impossible to prove.

Expand full comment

I'm so sorry to hear that. I know so many people who seem to have undergone something similar in the last year, but as you say - proving causation is all but impossible.

Expand full comment

Hello Us for Them,

Colburn is my MP!

I found it helpful, when trying to assess benefit vs harm ratio, to realise that no vaccine has ever been shown to be effective and that they are all toxic and harmful https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/lets-hope-the-monkey-pox-nonsense

Jo

🐒

Expand full comment